Re: Shavian

[Michael Everson]

At 08:00 +0100 2001-07-06, David Starner wrote:

>Could you find fault with some one who chose not to work with Cham because
>it was in the same "consideration list" as the (dead) Egyptian
>Hieroglyphics?

I don't believe the Vietnamese national body (which originally 
sponsored Cham, providing me with a very big Cham dictionary to help) 
holds this view. The reason the Vietnamese are not pressing Cham 
encoding is that they don't have funds for it now. I can't press it 
because I need their input.
-- 
Michael Everson