Michael Jansson wrote,
> > Code2000 is OpenType. Don't know about Code 2000. > > Ooops. Sorry about the typo. > That's OK. Actually, Michael Kaplan put the space in there and you just picked it up. I'm more concerned with the misinformation than the typo. It's happened a couple of times where someone has written in that the font isn't OpenType. If anyone on Windows platforms wants to check whether a font is OpenType, Microsoft has a free download called TTFEXT.EXE which reveals extended font properties when a font's icon is right clicked. Along with OpenType and code page information, this program reveals a font's licensing and copyright information. TTFEXT.EXE download page. http://www.microsoft.com/typography/property/property.htm > > <snip> > > Windows defaults to a more appropriate font if you select one that can not > show a particular language (well, there is much more to it than that, but > you get the idea). Sure, sometimes Windows defaults to a less appropriate font if you select one that can show a particular script. > For example, Latha does not contain Latin characters. > Still, you can use it to write English text. > I'm sceptical about that. (Or, as this might appear in any font which lacks Latin: ▯▯▯ ▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯▯ ▯▯▯▯▯ ▯▯▯▯. ) Best regards, James Kass.
