Thank you for [indirectly] making my point for me. I am saying that if someone has an issue that *does* make a difference then they should bring it up.
Otherwise, I say that a difference that makes no difference, make no difference. And we can move on to actual problems. :-) MichKa ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels > Michael Kaplan wrote on 06/25/2003 10:55:47 AM: > > > Let me add that this was the case recently for Hebrew (to mention on > > example). So it is certainly not impossible. > > The Hebrew issue is different: that involves things that *are* visually > distinct, and that distinction cannot be represented in a reliable manner. > > > - Peter > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > Peter Constable > > Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International > 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA > Tel: +1 972 708 7485 > > >
