Philippe Verdy <verdy_p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote: > The current use of CGJ is for sequences like: > <b>+<o, CGJ>+<e>+<u>+<f> and <e>+<f, CGJ>+<f>+<e>+<t> > which still encode the French words "boeuf" and "effet", where the > author gives a hint to display the sequence "oe" as a single ligated > form instead of two separate grapheme clusters, despite this > corresponds to the "classic" semantic of such sequence, including for > collation/sorting. Its use is then typographic, and enhance the > readability.
No, that's not right. ZWJ can be used as a hint to ligate Latin letters, but not CGJ. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
