Michael Everson scripsit:
> And sometimes not, then. What four characters have been corrected so
> far? Were they "important" characters to some company? Are there no
> Christians or Jews in the IETF who might care about a problem like
> this, where a simple solution might be effected? Particularly if it
> involves only a handful of characters, and the precedent for making
> such corrections has been set?
Every time your grip slips on the rope, that sets a precedent which will
in time tend to end up with you at the bottom of the mountain. The hard way.
So far we have corrected U+FB1D YOD WITH HIRIQ and six Han ideographs,
U+F951, U+2F868, U+2F874, U+2F91F, U+2F95F, U+2F9BF.
> This is not analogous to the present situation, it seems to me. In
> the first place, what else is the \ for? :-)
Escaping special characters, since you ask.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com
"If he has seen farther than others,
it is because he is standing on a stack of dwarves."
--Mike Champion, describing Tim Berners-Lee (adapted)
