From: "Kenneth Whistler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Also RFC 1345 indicates that the standard C0 and C1 > > control sets of ISO 6429 (ECMA-48) are used with ISO 8859-1, but I > > can't be certain if that is just the usual assumption or explicitly given > > in ISO 8859. > > It has nothing to do with ISO/IEC 8859-1:1998, per se.
May be you could have corrected the "ISO 6429 (ECMA-48)" equivalence. >From what I read in ECMA-48, fifth edition, it extends the 4th edition which was approved in ISO 6429. But I don't think that the amendments in ECMA-48 for bidirectional controls where included in a later edition of ISO 6429 for now. Interestingly, I don't know if those controls added in the 5th edition of ECMA-48 are encodable directly with Unicode, given that the "Bidi" controls that are implemented are not completely equivalent to the Unicode Bidi format controls (or at least I can't find a mapping for them because names don't match).
