Actually, I *was* talking about purely typographic/aesthetic ligatures
as well. I'm aware that which di-/trigraphs need to be considered from a
font design perspective is language-dependent. But the point is that I
observe that:
(a) aesthetic ligatures are not frequently seen in modern German print and
(b) the absence of such ligatures doesn't offend me (in modern German
print).
It could be - and a quick visual check confirms this - that the fonts
used for printing of {novels, school textbooks, tech/science books, ...}
and the associated kerning tables don't necessitate ligatures or have
traditionally (fwiw) not been seen as necessitating them. Enough
professional publishing houses I _think_ don't use aesthetic ligatures,
so that, whenever I do see them in German text, they stand out to me. So
/de facto/ usage of aesthetic ligatures seems a bit like a locale
parameter to me.
That said - if I'm really factually wrong (and ligatures in modern
German text are just so subtle and pervasive that I never took notice),
people on the list please feel free to correct me.
Stephan
On 9/9/2011 4:14 PM, Kent Karlsson wrote:
I was talking about purely typographic ligatures, in particular
ligatures used because the glyphs (normally spaced) would otherwise
overlap in an unpleasing manner. If the glyphs don't overlap (or
there is extra spacing, which is quite ugly in itself if used in
"normal" text), no need to use a (purely typographic) ligature.
So it is a font design issue. (And then there are also ornamental
typographic ligatures, like the st ligature, but those are outside
of what I was talking about here.) But of course, which pairs of
letters (or indeed also punctuation) are likely to occur adjacently
is language dependent.
/Kent K
Den 2011-09-09 23:45, skrev "Stephan Stiller"<sstil...@stanford.edu>:
Pardon my asking, as this is not my specialty:
There are several other ligatures
that *should* be formed (automatically) by "run of the mill" fonts:
for instance the "fj" ligature, just to mention one that I find
particularly important (and that does not have a compatibility code
point).
About the "should" - isn't this language-dependent? For example I recall
that ordinary German print literature barely uses any ligatures at all
these days (ie: I'm not talking about historical texts). And, has anyone
ever attempted to catalogue such ligature practices? (Is this suitable
for CLDR?)
(I also recall being taken aback by the odd look of ligatures in many
LaTeX-typeset English scientific documents, but I suspect that's rather
because some of the commonly used fonts there are lacking in aesthetic
design.)
Stephan
