On 19 October 2011 10:43, shi zhao <shiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > The page said kTraditionalVariant of U+2B5B8 is U+9858 願.
which is correct. > ) said U+2B5B8 𫖸 is kSimplifiedVariant of U+9858 願, U+613F 愿 is > kSemanticVariant, but 愿 is simplified of 願, not U+2B5B8 𫖸. which I agree is not correct. It's not always clear how asymmetrical cases like this should be handled. For U+9918 餘, which is analagous, with a common simplified form U+4F59 余 and an alternate simplified form U+9980 馀, the Unihan database lists them both as simplified variants of U+9918: U+9918 kSimplifiedVariant U+4F59 U+9980 On this precedent, I would expect: U+9858 kSimplifiedVariant U+613F U+2B5B8 I suggest you report this issue on the Unicode Error Reporting form: <http://www.unicode.org/reporting.html> Andrew
