Le 12/06/2016 02:20, Doug Ewell a écrit :
Marcel Schneider wrote:
While some characters were retained, others were rejected, among which
the Latin Theta pair, but no mention is found of this rejection in the
Non-Approval Notices.
Lots of characters in proposals are rejected without rising to the
level of explicit disapproval: "Look, we said NO, and don't ask us
again." The Non-Approval Notices page starts with an extensive
description of the difference.
At the same time, note that a few proposals, such as LATIN CAPITAL
LETTER SHARP S, have risen phoenix-like from the ranks of
non-approvaldom to become genuine encoded characters.
And, if I I remember correctly, to proposal for the Latin letter theta
yet has given example of the current usage of ttheta in latin
orthography, like in Rromani
(http://www.rromaniconnect.org/Rromanifonts.html,
http://romani.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/whatis/status/codification.shtml
). I guess a proposal based on the Rromani orthography, (and with input
for the user community, of course!) would easily be accepted.
Cheers,
Frédéric
