On 5/17/2017 2:31 PM, Richard
Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
There's some sort of rule that proposals should be made seven days in advance of the meeting. I can't find it now, so I'm not sure whether the actual rule was followed, let alone what authority it has. Ideally, proposals that update algorithms or properties of some significance should be required to be reviewed in more than one pass. The procedures of the UTC are a bit weak in that respect, at least compared to other standards organizations. The PRI process addresses that issue to some extent. A./ |
- Re: Feedback on t... Hans Åberg via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to ch... Hans Åberg via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FF... Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change... Hans Åberg via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FF... Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to ch... Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FF... Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to ch... Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal t... Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the propos... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the p... Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the propos... Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal t... Henri Sivonen via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the propos... Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the p... Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the p... Jonathan Coxhead via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on t... Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: Feedback on the proposal to change... Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode