Philippe Verdy wrote: > Note that I actually propose not just one rendering for the <combining > abbrevaition mark> but two possible variants (that would be equally > valid withou preference). Actually you're not proposing them. You're talking about them (at length) on the public mailing list. If you want to propose something, you should consider writing a proposal. -- Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
- Re: Encoding <combining abbreviation mark&... Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Encoding <combining abbreviation ... Marcel Schneider via Unicode