Fred Brennan wrote:

> The purpose of Unicode is plaintext encoding, is it not? The square TB
> form is fundamentally no different than the square form of Reiwa,
> U+32FF ㋿, which was added in a hurry. The difference is that SQUARE
> TB's necessity and use is a slow thing which happened over years, not
> all of a sudden via one announcement of the Japanese government.

I think the case you are going to have to make is that applications exist which 
*must* use the single-code-point character for this purpose, instead of simply 
being able to use U+0054 plus U+0042.

As others have stated, it was easily demonstrated that applications existed in 
Japan which required a single code point for the era name. That is what 
necessitated the acceptance, let alone fast-tracking, of U+32FF SQUARE ERA NAME 
REIWA.

The characters in the CJK Compatibility block were added for exactly that 
reason — compatibility with character encoding standards that existed prior to 
Unicode. There has never been any expectation that sets or sequences in that 
and other "compatibility" blocks would be updated continually. Compatibility 
with character sets created since the wide adoption of Unicode, such as in 
2008, is also not guaranteed.

Earlier I wrote "[t]his seems like a reasonable candidate for a proposal," not 
necessarily because UTC will agree with the stated use case, but because 
talking about such a character on the mailing list won't get it added.

> In plaintext SQUARE TB is fundamentally different than ASCII T followed by
> ASCII B. Plaintext tables (and programs generating them) and files already
> using SQUARE MB, SQUARE GB, etc benefit from SQUARE TB.

That is something you would have to demonstrate in your proposal: that there 
are important processes (as in, "the government and industry and commerce 
depend on this") that use ㎅ ㎆ ㎇ which it would not be feasible to extend or 
modify to use Basic Latin TB, PB, EB, etc. That was the case made for the Reiwa 
sign: that there were important processes using ㍾ ㍽ ㍼ ㍻ that could not simply 
use the two existing characters 令和 for Reiwa.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org



Reply via email to