Dear Ken
An interesting comparison, if strange means dubious, then the name
kstrange should be changed or some of the content removed because many
of the characters in the set are not dubious in the least.
Regards
John
On 2020-02-14 04:08, Ken Whistler via Unicode wrote:
You want "dubious"?!
You should see the hundreds of strange characters already encoded in
the CJK *Unified* Ideographs blocks, as recently documented in great
detail by Ken Lunde:
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20059-unihan-kstrange-update.pdf
Compared to many of those, a hieroglyph of a man (or woman) holding a
laptop is positively orthodox!
--Ken
On 2/13/2020 11:47 AM, Phake Nick via Unicode wrote:
Those characters could also be put into another block for the same
script similar to how dubious characters in CJK are included by
placing them into "CJK Compatibility Ideographs" for round trip
compatibility with source encoding.
