Thank you Erez.
I will see about getting you access.
I will let you know as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
John
> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 19:35:40 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Unionfs] Possible timestamp related problem.
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Nielsen writes:
>
> > Erez,
> > I'm sorry to report that your patch didnt work. I applied it to
> > unionfs-2.1.10 and also tried unionfs-2.1.11. It appeared that the patch
> > was already applied to this version however. Neither versions solved my
> > problem.
> >
> > Were you able to reproduce the issue yourself?
>
> Sorry, no. I tried everything I could to simulate your env, and several
> variations too, but I couldn't reproduce it. Any chance I can get temp
> remote access to your system? Since you're able to reproduce this reliably,
> that'd help a lot (my experience is that reproducing a kernel bug is >80% of
> the fix!)
>
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > John
>
> Thanks,
> Erez.
> _______________________________________________
> unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/
> unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu
> http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
_________________________________________________________________
Saml dine online aktiviteter på din PC med Windows Live
www.windowslive.dk/suite
_______________________________________________
unionfs mailing list: http://unionfs.filesystems.org/
unionfs@mail.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu
http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/mailman/listinfo/unionfs
