On 5/12/13 8:52 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
Anyway, I'm sure there are circumstances where this change would provide a significant performance improvement. I just think they are few and far between and would much rather see RunRev spend their time, no matter how little, on fixing<insert your favorite bug number here>. I've seen so many software projects get delayed by sneaking in random features like this - it's not just the time it takes to code them, it's the time to do the various levels of testing, documentation, etc as well.
These things are never done on a whim. RR works on their own customer projects internally. They not only have their own clients but there are also some registered users who pay extra to get custom issues addressed for their development problems. The revision eventually gets added to the main release and we all benefit.
I'm pretty sure that the new caching scheme wasn't just pulled out of the air randomly. RR needed it for a reason.
-- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [email protected] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
