Scott, that certainly tallies with my experience of the "with
messages" form - it's the tight polling loops that seem to be greedy.
best,
Mark
On 9 Jun 2009, at 21:53, Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Mark Smith wrote:
Yes, I think you have to be careful with mouse stuff:
on mouseDown
repeat
if the mouse is up then exit repeat
put the mouseloc
end repeat
end mouseDown
In my experience, the processor load is relative to the frequency
of Rev's
messages. Messages sent with a frequency of once a second or
longer do not
appear to significantly impact the processor. As message frequency
increases to intervals less than one second, processor load begins to
increase significantly.
One interesting exception is "wait... with messages". This can
effectively
act as an ultra fast loop or repeat but does not appear to impact
processor
load (at least not according to OS X's Activity Monitor).
on mouseUp
wait until mouseH() > 200 with messages
put "done"
end mouseUp
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
