On 21 September 2010 12:28, -=>JB<=- <sund...@pacifier.com> wrote:
> I think it is the On-Rev package that has been offered > for quite some time now and many have purchased > it already so if they continue to develop it more will > likely purchase it and with the right improvements > it can exceed their sales expectations. > That would make sense - On-Rev has (commercial) potential, but I don't think it is the case. If you look at the Standalone Settings (I am viewing it with a trial license) - the Web settings that allow you to create a revWeb plugin has the option to purchase a $199 upgrade - I assume this is in order to let you make these plugins as this export option has nothing to do with using On-Rev. It is not clear, if you can make them for non-commercial use, but it looks like the standalone builder will stop making revWeb plugins after the trial expires? Personally I can (sort of) imagine people paying $30 for the ability to make revWeb plugins - I really don't get this $199 pricing. The rest seems logical to me, and I do very much like the branding LiveCode, but it seems the current pricing strategy will have two clear outcomes: 1. It will clobber Linux sales - I think the bundles would be better Mac+Linux and Windows+Linux. 2. Deter future revWeb plugin development when it becomes clear how many people will pay for it as an isolated feature. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution