pe...@xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5$ ls
Documentation livecode.x86 Resources Runtime
Externals Plugins revpdfprinter.so Toolset
License Agreement.txt Release Notes.pdf revsecurity.so
pe...@xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5$ ./livecode.x86
pe...@xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5$ pwd
/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5
pe...@xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5$ su
Password:
xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5# pwd
/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5
xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5# ./livecode.x86
xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5#
So, if you do su the working directory remains the same. If you are in the
working directory without su, Rev starts. If you are in the same working
directory after having done su, it asks you to register.
Don't get it. The difference of course is that when it works, its
identifying the user:
pe...@xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5$ ./livecode.x86
as opposed to in the other case, where the prompt is just
xxxx:/opt/runrev/livecode-4.5# ./livecode.x86
So the difference is, it is looking for the registration in a particular
user home folder? But in that case, why install in /opt? And why restrict
the use to one account on a multi account system? Makes no sense, no-one
else does it, do they?
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/a-weird-thing-about-registration-Linux-tp3022230p3022581.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
