amen! I used to take Tom Pittman's advice for Compilit and use his notation for integers - % and they screamed with speed... and the old Hyperbasic XCMD generator had great array capabilities. I don't mind typing variables optionally if it speeds up things.

sqb

At 7:30 PM -0400 5/4/05, Dennis Brown wrote:
This BZ on arrays would be a welcome enhancement, but it would not improve the speed of processing arrays. I was thinking along the lines of a high speed array processing instruction subset. They would be less flexible than what we have now --the nice flexible data types, dynamic memory allocation, and flexible key names are what costs the operators so much time to execute. Just let me define the dimensions and data size for a fixed memory allocation and provide operators that work on fixed data types. It should fly through the array calculations at least ten times faster. I just entered a BZ request for it. If you agree, vote.

BZ# 2813

Dennis
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to