As a further clarification for those of us who like to "understand";
not just have something "work"; Think back to all of the programs
that create a "print spool". They are just creating an image in
memory of what is normally being seen on the screen and then using
that "memory" image to do the printing. As Jacque was indicating,
absolutely no need for anything to be visible in order to print it.
In fact, since we usually see things at a 72 dpi resolution on our
screens, this translation is absolutely necessary if we are to print
at the much higher resolutions available with today's printers.
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:02 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
"Not really,"
And the RR world needs to know something:-
There are an awful lot of "purists" about who try to
do things the "proper way".
I agree, and I didn't mean to imply one couldn't or shouldn't do it
your way. Rev's flexibility is pretty incredible. I just didn't
want the original poster to think that he couldn't print images
*unless* they were in a field, which is what he assumed. (I have to
admit your approach was original. ;))
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
