> this is what I have for instructions:
> >git clone https://github.com/oblac/jodd.git
> >gradlew build
> Please verify
> Thanks!
> Martin
I can at least assemble JARs, but tests are failing. As I'm using windows
powershell I must explicitly write:
.\gradlew.bat assemble
('assemble' omits tests)
And I'm behind a proxy so I had to add a 'gradle.properties' file and
configure the proxy there.
Regards,
Christoph
> ______________________________________________
>
>
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > CC: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework
> > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:11:38 +0100
> >
> > Hi!
> > Can you check now? We moved to Gradle 2.10 yesterday, but obviously
there
> > was a
> > left over from previous version (2.6).
> > Would you be so kind to pull the change and try again? It worked here.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 18:34, Martin Gainty <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > can anyone clone ?
> > > gradlew build Downloading
> > https://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.6-all.zip
> > Exception in thread "main" javax.net.ssl.SSLException:
> > java.security.ProviderExc eption: SunPKCS11 requires configuration
file
> > argument
> > ...if I bypass cert checking I get the zip... wget
--no-check-certificate
> > https://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.6-all.zip
> >
> > what is gradlew missing to download
> > https\://services.gradle.org/distributions/gradle-2.6-all.zip
> > ?
> > Martin
> > ______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:32:45 -0500
> > > Subject: Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > >
> > > I'm just not a fan of declaring things based on strings, including
> > result
> > > types.
> > >
> > > I don't know what the easiest/best answer is, probably I'll end up
doing
> > > nothing :(
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Christoph Nenning <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > The async thing is nice; that would be a good thing to bring
into
> > S2.
> > > > >
> > > > > I still don't like the string-based action returns; strings are
just
> > > > awful.
> > > > > I don't have a better solution (yet).
> > > > >
> > > > > It might be a good time for me to rethink the code-based config
I'd
> > > > > implemented some time ago, e.g., use a Groovy or whatever DSL
to
> > config
> > > > the
> > > > > results, that way they end up being code artifacts.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Another approach could be to define a Result class to avoid
mapping of
> > > > strings, e.g.:
> > > >
> > > > return new Result("dispatch", "test.jsp");
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This would keep current result types with all their
string-parameters.
> > But
> > > > it would not be necessary to configure them and no name-matching
would
> > > > take place.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Christoph
> > > >
> > > > This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > e: [email protected]
> > > m: 908-380-8699
> > > s: davelnewton_skype
> > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
> > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
> > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
> > > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
>
This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus
