On Sunday 27 November 2005 22:41, Rob Landley wrote: > On Sunday 27 November 2005 13:20, Blaisorblade wrote:
> *shrug* The same argument could be made about any other argument that > mount interprets. (Currently: loop, defaults, noauto, ro, rw, nosuid, > suid, dev, nodev, exec, noexec, sync, async, remount, atime, noatime, > diratime, nodiratime, bind, move, and rbind.) No, it's not the same story. What keeps both pieces together is mount being a de-facto standard. Any fs coder who takes one of that as an fs option will have his head lopped at the very moment he does it. So, start making busybox mount incompatible with util-linux mount (I mean for features, not for "undefined behaviour" situations) and you'll break stuff. ( I didn't know about diratime... ) > And no, I didn't invent mount interpreting any of that. I can make it > depend on loopback support (which is already a config option for mount; you > can disable features out of the apps in busybox to shrink the size). > Rob -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
