On 4/11/07, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead of writing entire structures between UML and the I/O thread,
> we send pointers. This cuts down on the amount of data being copied
> and possibly allows more requests to be pending between the two.
<snip>
>
> - n = os_write_file_k(thread_fd, (char *) &io_req,
> - sizeof(io_req));
> - if(n != sizeof(io_req)){
> + n = os_write_file_k(thread_fd, &io_req,
> + sizeof(struct io_thread_req *));
> + if(n != sizeof(struct io_thread_req *)){
Is this wrong? you declare io_reg as a pointer but then you pass him
to os_write_file_k by reference of a pointer? Should you just do this
instead:
> + n = os_write_file_k(thread_fd, io_req,
> + sizeof(struct io_thread_req *));
Was this intentional, or am I just an idiot. :)
-Jerry
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
