On Wednesday 30 March 2016 08:29:45 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 March 2016 10:13:53 Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>
> >> I fully understand your point of view. COMPILE_TEST is a monster that
> >> can do the heavy lifting for you, but monsters also have claws and fangs.
> >>
> >> Having COMPILE_TEST having depend on !UML works for me. But don't
> >> we have other archs without io mem? At least a few years ago while
> >> porting nandsim to UML I found s390 that lacks of io mem too.
> >
> > s390 gained IOMEM support when they started having PCI attachments.
> 
> I'm confused how s390 defines HAS_IOMEM and includes it from lib/Kconfig 
> though.

Kconfig can define the same symbol multiple times, which is really
confusing. I only checked for NO_IOMEM, which s390 no longer defines,
but I have not checked what actually happens in case of two conflicting
definitions, where the one lib/Kconfig defaults to 'y' and the one in
arch/s390 defaults to CONFIG_PCI.

        Arnd

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to