On 19.08.2016 12:48, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > On 08/19/2016 03:14 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Andrey Ryabinin >> <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Sorry for delays, I am travelling. >>>> Do we need ".fini_array" section? It's also destructors that we don't >>>> run. Or does UML use them? Does discarding ".fini_array" help? >>>> >>> >>> libc has desctructors and use them for whatever purpose it needs. >> >> >> Does UML actually gracefully exit running global destructors? That >> would also require gracefully shutting down all threads/cpus. Doesn't >> it just _exit (or syscall(SYS_exit_group))? >> > > Sigh, I dunno, I didn't look that far. My intention was to fix build and keep > old behavior unaffected. > If you want to wipe destructors, and think that this is ok, go ahead.
UML exits like any regular C program does. The main() function is in arch/um/os-Linux/main.c, when the kernel terminates, hence linux_main() returns back to main() it just returns the exit code. At this point libc's destructors will run, right? Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
