> Am 22.05.2017 um 21:37 schrieb Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>:
> 
> Thomas,
> 
>> Am 22.05.2017 um 21:18 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>> 
>>> Am 22.05.2017 um 20:34 schrieb Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at>:
>>> 
>>> Thomas,
>>> 
>>>> Am 22.05.2017 um 20:14 schrieb Thomas Meyer:
>>>> It's purely cosmetic; to get rid of the boot message: "This architecture 
>>>> does not have kernel memory protection." in init/main.c
>>>> 
>>>> Which isn't true for UML as all read only stuff should end up in a read 
>>>> only ELF section. Shouldn't it?
>>> 
>>> Hmm, reading /proc/<pid of uml>/maps tells a different story on my host.
>>> Did you check?
>> 
>> No... I may should have done so...
>> 
>> Okay, but it should be possible to mprotect those regions ?
> 
> Yes, it should.
> Can you give it a try?

Will do so!

> 
> Thanks,
> //richard
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
> User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Reply via email to