On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Aditya Muralidharan <aditya.muralidha...@nisc.coop> wrote: > Thanks for the response. We're trying to get a general idea of the insert and > retrieval performance, and we figured BinaryMemtable would be a great enabler > for our bulk import scenarios. Normal thrift inserts are certainly fast, but > it would be nice to get an idea of how BMT could improve our throughput.
Before you go trying to improve it, you should be sure that it needs improvement. > Are you able to share some general performance numbers for thrift/avro/bmt? We've consistently found that BMT was unnecessary. We've always run into some other limit first. -ryan
