> Save the skills in a single column in json format.  Job done.
>
Good if  it have fixed set of skills, then any add or delete changes need
handle in app. ->read column first->reformat JOSN->update column (2 thrift
calls).

 skill~Java: null,
 skill~Cassandra: null
This is also good option, but any schema change will break it.


On Mar 26, 2012 7:04 PM, "Ben McCann" <b...@benmccann.com> wrote:
>
>> True.  But I don't need the skills to be searchable, so I'd rather embed
>> them in the user than add another top-level CF.  I was thinking of doing
>> something along the lines of adding a skills super column to the User table:
>>
>> skills: {
>>   'java': null,
>>   'c++': null,
>>   'cobol': null
>> }
>>
>> However, I'm still not sure yet how to accomplish this with Astyanax.
>>  I've only figured out how to make composite columns with predefined column
>> names with it and not dynamic column names like this.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:08 AM, R. Verlangen <ro...@us2.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> In this case you only neem the columns for values. You don't need the
>>> column-values to hold multiple columns (the super-column principle). So a
>>> normal CF would work.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/3/26 Ben McCann <b...@benmccann.com>
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the reply Samal.  I did not realize that you could store a
>>>> column with null value.  Do you know if this solution would work with
>>>> composite columns?  It seems super columns are being phased out in favor of
>>>> composites, but I do not understand composites very well yet.  I'm trying
>>>> to figure out if there's any way to accomplish what you've suggested using
>>>> Astyanax <https://github.com/Netflix/astyanax>.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the help,
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 8:46 AM, samal <samalgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> plus it is fully compatible with CQL.
>>>>> SELECT * FROM UserSkill WHERE KEY='ben';
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:13 PM, samal <samalgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would take simple approach. create one other CF "UserSkill"  with
>>>>>> row key same as profile_cf key,
>>>>>> In user_skill cf will add skill as column name and value null.
>>>>>> Columns can be added or removed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UserProfile={
>>>>>>   '*ben*'={
>>>>>>    blah :blah
>>>>>>    blah :blah
>>>>>>    blah :blah
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UserSkill={
>>>>>>   '*ben*'={
>>>>>>     'java':''
>>>>>>     'cassandra':''
>>>>>>   .
>>>>>>   .
>>>>>>   .
>>>>>>   'linux':''
>>>>>>   'skill':'infinity'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Ben McCann <b...@benmccann.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a profile column family and want to store a list of skills in
>>>>>>> each profile.  In BigTable I could store a Protocol 
>>>>>>> Buffer<http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/overview.html>with
>>>>>>>  a repeated field, but I'm not sure how this is typically accomplished
>>>>>>> in Cassandra.  One option would be to store a serialized 
>>>>>>> Thrift<http://thrift.apache.org/>or protobuf, but I'd prefer not to do 
>>>>>>> this as I believe Cassandra doesn't
>>>>>>> have knowledge of these formats, and so the data in the datastore would 
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> not human readable in CQL queries from the command line.  The other
>>>>>>> solution I thought of would be to use a super column and put a random 
>>>>>>> UUID
>>>>>>> as the key for each skill:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> skills: {
>>>>>>>   '4b27c2b3ac48e8df': 'java',
>>>>>>>   '84bf94ea7bc92018': 'c++',
>>>>>>>   '9103b9a93ce9d18': 'cobol'
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this a good way of handling lists in Cassandra?  I imagine
>>>>>>> there's some idiom I'm not aware of.  I'm using the 
>>>>>>> Astyanax<https://github.com/Netflix/astyanax/wiki>client library, which 
>>>>>>> only supports composite columns instead of super
>>>>>>> columns, and so the solution I proposed above would seem quite awkward 
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> that case.  Though I'm still having some trouble understanding composite
>>>>>>> columns as they seem not to be completely documented yet.  Would this
>>>>>>> solution work with composite columns?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Ben
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With kind regards,
>>>
>>> Robin Verlangen
>>> www.robinverlangen.nl
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to