The question assumes that it's likely that datastax employees become
committers.
Actually, it's more likely that committers become datastax employees.
So this underlying tone that datastax only really 'wants' datastax
employees to be cassandra committers, is really misleading.
Why wouldn't a company want to hire people who have shown a desire and
aptitude to work on products that they care about? It's just rational.
And damn genius, actually.
I'm sure they'd be happy to have an influx of non-datastax committers.
patches welcome.
dave
On 05/17/2014 08:28 AM, Peter Lin wrote:
if you look at the new committers since 2012 they are mostly datastax
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com
<mailto:bur...@spinn3r.com>> wrote:
so 30%… according to that data.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Michael Shuler
<mich...@pbandjelly.org <mailto:mich...@pbandjelly.org>> wrote:
On 05/14/2014 03:39 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
I'm curious what % of cassandra developers are employed by
Datastax?
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/Committers
--
Kind regards,
Michael
--
Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com <http://Spinn3r.com>
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
Skype: *burtonator*
blog:**http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
<https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts>
<http://spinn3r.com>
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
Corporations are people.
