On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote:
> > As an aside, you "just lose" with vnodes and clusters of the size. I > presume you plan to grow over appx 9 nodes per DC, in which case you > probably do want vnodes enabled. > I typically only see discussion on vnodes vs. non-vnodes, but it seems to me that might be more important to discuss the number of vnodes per node. A small cluster having 256 vnodes/node is unwise given some of the sequential operations that are still done. Even if operations were done in parallel, having a 256x increase in parallelization seems an equally bad choice. I've never seen any discussion on how many vnodes per node might be an appropriate answer based a planned cluster size -- does such a thing exist? Ken
