Sorry I should have more clear. What I meant was doing exactly what you wrote, but do a “removenode” instead of “decommission” to make it even faster. Will that have any side-effect (I think it shouldn’t) ?
From: Jeff Jirsa [mailto:jeff.ji...@crowdstrike.com] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 4:43 PM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Removing a datacenter If you remove a node at a time, you’ll eventually end up with a single node in the DC you’re decommissioning which will own all of the data, and you’ll likely overwhelm that node. It’s typically recommended that you ALTER the keyspace, remove the replication settings for that DC, and then you can decommission (and they won’t need to stream nearly as much, since they no longer own that data – decom will go much faster). From: Anubhav Kale Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" Date: Monday, May 23, 2016 at 4:41 PM To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>" Subject: Removing a datacenter Hello, Suppose we have 2 DCs and we know that the data is correctly replicated in both. In such situation, is it safe to “remove” one of the DCs by simply doing a “nodetool remove node” followed by “nodetool removenode force” for each node in that DC (instead of doing a “nodetool decommission” and waiting for it to finish) ? Can someone confirm this won’t have any odd side-effects ? Thanks !
