Check out our post on how to use TWCS before 3.0.

http://thelastpickle.com/blog/2017/01/10/twcs-part2.html

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:20 AM John Sanda <john.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It was with STCS. It was on a 2.x version before TWCS was available.
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:58 AM DuyHai Doan <doanduy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Did you get this Overwhelming tombstonne behavior with STCS or with TWCS ?
>
> If you're using DTCS, beware of its weird behavior and tricky
> configuration.
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 3:52 PM, John Sanda <john.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your partitioning key is text. If you have multiple entries per id you are
> likely hitting older cells that have expired. Descending only affects how
> the data is stored on disk, if you have to read the whole partition to find
> whichever time you are querying for you could potentially hit tombstones in
> other SSTables that contain the same "id". As mentioned previously, you
> need to add a time bucket to your partitioning key and definitely use
> DTCS/TWCS.
>
>
> As I mentioned previously, the UI only queries recent data, e.g., the past
> hour, past two hours, past day, past week. The UI does not query for
> anything older than the TTL which is 7 days. My understanding and
> expectation was that Cassandra would only scan live cells. The UI is a
> separate application that I do not maintain, so I am not 100% certain about
> the queries. I have been told that it does not query for anything older
> than 7 days.
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:14 AM, kurt greaves <k...@instaclustr.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Your partitioning key is text. If you have multiple entries per id you are
> likely hitting older cells that have expired. Descending only affects how
> the data is stored on disk, if you have to read the whole partition to find
> whichever time you are querying for you could potentially hit tombstones in
> other SSTables that contain the same "id". As mentioned previously, you
> need to add a time bucket to your partitioning key and definitely use
> DTCS/TWCS.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> - John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to