On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Abhishek Verma <ve...@uber.com> wrote:
> Cassandra is being used on a large scale at Uber. We usually create > dedicated clusters for each of our internal use cases, however that is > difficult to scale and manage. > > We are investigating the approach of using a single shared cluster with > 100s of nodes and handle 10s to 100s of different use cases for different > products in the same cluster. We can define different keyspaces for each of > them, but that does not help in case of noisy neighbors. > > Does anybody in the community have similar large shared clusters and/or > face noisy neighbor issues? > Hi, We've never tried this approach and given my limited experience I would find this a terrible idea from the perspective of maintenance (remember the old saying about basket and eggs?) What potential benefits do you see? Regards, -- Alex
