Thank you Eric for helping out. The reason I sent the question a second time is because I did not see my question and the first reply from the usergroup. After I sent the question a second time, I got a personal flame from somebody else too and so examined my "spam" folders and that's where I found both. All the same, I got some very valuable pointers and am pasting here as a summary
https://docs.datastax.com/en/cassandra/2.1/cassandra/tools/toolsRepair.html https://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/repair-in-cassandra https://www.pythian.com/blog/effective-anti-entropy-repair-cassandra/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Sz_K8UID6E On 3/15/17, 10:22 AM, "Eric Evans" <john.eric.ev...@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:04 PM, daemeon reiydelle <daeme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am I unreasonable in expecting a poster to have looked at the documentation > before posting? And that reposting the same query WITHOUT reading the > documents (when pointed out to them) when asked to do so is not appropriate? It may be reasonable to assume that people will make a good faith effort to read the docs, but what is unreasonable is to presume that an RTFM will do any good whatsoever. In my experience, there is almost always a more productive approach. > Do we have a way to blackball such? No, but no one is making you respond, either. -- Eric Evans john.eric.ev...@gmail.com
