I wonder if you are building up tombstones with the deletes. Can you share your 
data model? Are the deleted rows using the same partition key as new rows? Any 
warnings in your system.log for reading through too many tombstones?


Sean Durity

From: Mihai Stanescu <mihai.stane...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2018 12:03 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Cassandra rate dropping over long term test

I looked at the compaction history on the affected node when it was affected 
and it was not affected.

The number of compactions is fairly similar and the amount of work also.

Not affected time
[root@cassandra7 ~]# nodetool compactionhistory | grep 02T22
fda43ca0-9696-11e8-8efb-25b020ed0402 demodb        topic_message     
2018-08-02T22:59:47.946 433124864  339496194  {1:3200576, 2:2025936, 3:262919}
8a83e2c0-9696-11e8-8efb-25b020ed0402 demodb        topic_message     
2018-08-02T22:56:34.796 133610579  109321990  {1:1574352, 2:434814}
01811e20-9696-11e8-8efb-25b020ed0402 demodb        topic_message     
2018-08-02T22:52:44.930 132847372  108175388  {1:1577164, 2:432508}

Experiencing more ioread
[root@cassandra7 ~]# nodetool compactionhistory | grep 03T12
389aa220-970c-11e8-8efb-25b020ed0402 demodb        topic_message     
2018-08-03T12:58:57.986 470326446  349948622  {1:2590960, 2:2600102, 3:298369}
81fe6f10-970b-11e8-8efb-25b020ed0402 demodb        topic_message     
2018-08-03T12:53:51.617 143850880  115555226  {1:1686260, 2:453627}
ce418e30-970a-11e8-8efb-25b020ed0402 demodb        topic_message     
2018-08-03T12:48:50.067 147035600  119201638  {1:1742318, 2:452226}

During a read operation the row can mostly be in one sstable since was only 
inserted and then read so its strange.

We have a partition key and then a clustering key.

Rows that are written should be in kernel buffers and the rows which are lost 
to delete are never read again either so the kernel should have only the most 
recent data.

I remain puzzled



On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Jeff Jirsa 
<jji...@gmail.com<mailto:jji...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Probably Compaction

Cassandra data files are immutable

The write path first appends to a commitlog, then puts data into the memtable. 
When the memtable hits a threshold, it’s flushed to data files on disk (let’s 
call the first one “1”, second “2” and so on)

Over time we build up multiple data files on disk - when Cassandra reads, it 
will merge data in those files to give you the result you expect, choosing the 
latest value for each column

But it’s usually wasteful to lots of files around, and that merging is 
expensive, so compaction combines those data files behind the scenes in a 
background thread.

By default they’re combined when 4 or more files are approximately the same 
size, so if your write rate is such that you fill and flush the memtable every 
5 minutes, compaction will likely happen at least every 20 minutes (sometimes 
more). This is called size tiered compaction; there are 4 strategies but size 
tiered is default and easiest to understand.

You’re seeing mostly writes because the reads are likely in page cache (the 
kernel doesn’t need to go to disk to read the files, it’s got them in memory 
for serving normal reads).

--
Jeff Jirsa


> On Aug 3, 2018, at 12:30 AM, Mihai Stanescu 
> <mihai.stane...@gmail.com<mailto:mihai.stane...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am perftesting cassandra over a longrun in a cluster of 8 nodes and i 
> noticed the rate of service drops.
> Most of the nodes have the CPU between 40-65% however one of the nodes has a 
> higher CPU and also started performing a lot of read IOPS as seen in the 
> image. (green is read IOPS)
>
> My test has a mixed rw scenario.
> 1. insert row
> 2. after 60 seconds read row
> 3. delete row.
>
> The rate of inserts is bigger than the rate of deletes so some delete will 
> not happen.
>
> I have checked the client it it does not accumulate RAM, GC is a straight 
> line so o don't understand whats going on.
>
> Any hints?
>
> Regards,
> MIhai
>
> <image.png>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
user-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: 
user-h...@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user-h...@cassandra.apache.org>


________________________________

The information in this Internet Email is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Email by 
anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in 
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our 
clients any opinions or advice contained in this Email are subject to the terms 
and conditions expressed in any applicable governing The Home Depot terms of 
business or client engagement letter. The Home Depot disclaims all 
responsibility and liability for the accuracy and content of this attachment 
and for any damages or losses arising from any inaccuracies, errors, viruses, 
e.g., worms, trojan horses, etc., or other items of a destructive nature, which 
may be contained in this attachment and shall not be liable for direct, 
indirect, consequential or special damages in connection with this e-mail 
message or its attachment.

Reply via email to