What is recommended vnodes now? I read 8 in later cassandra 3.x
Is the new recommendation 4 now even in version 3.x (asking for 3.11)?
Thanks

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:49 AM Durity, Sean R <sean_r_dur...@homedepot.com>
wrote:

> These are good clarifications and expansions.
>
>
>
> Sean Durity
>
>
>
> *From:* Anthony Grasso <anthony.gra...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 30, 2020 7:25 PM
> *To:* user <user@cassandra.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] How to reduce vnodes without downtime
>
>
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
>
>
> Basically what Sean suggested is the way to do this without downtime.
>
>
>
> To clarify the, the *three* steps following the "Decommission each node
> in the DC you are working on" step should be applied to *only* the
> decommissioned nodes. So where it say "*all nodes*" or "*every node*" it
> applies to only the decommissioned nodes.
>
>
>
> In addition, the step that says "Wipe data on all the nodes", I would
> delete all files in the following directories on the decommissioned nodes.
>
>    - data (usually located in /var/lib/cassandra/data)
>    - commitlogs (usually located in /var/lib/cassandra/commitlogs)
>    - hints (usually located in /var/lib/casandra/hints)
>    - saved_caches (usually located in /var/lib/cassandra/saved_caches)
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 03:05, Durity, Sean R <sean_r_dur...@homedepot.com>
> wrote:
>
> Your procedure won’t work very well. On the first node, if you switched to
> 4, you would end up with only a tiny fraction of the data (because the
> other nodes would still be at 256). I updated a large cluster (over 150
> nodes – 2 DCs) to smaller number of vnodes. The basic outline was this:
>
>
>
>    - Stop all repairs
>    - Make sure the app is running against one DC only
>    - Change the replication settings on keyspaces to use only 1 DC
>    (basically cutting off the other DC)
>    - Decommission each node in the DC you are working on. Because the
>    replication setting are changed, no streaming occurs. But it releases the
>    token assignments
>    - Wipe data on all the nodes
>    - Update configuration on every node to your new settings, including
>    auto_bootstrap = false
>    - Start all nodes. They will choose tokens, but not stream any data
>    - Update replication factor for all keyspaces to include the new DC
>    - I disabled binary on those nodes to prevent app connections
>    - Run nodetool reduild with -dc (other DC) on as many nodes as your
>    system can safely handle until they are all rebuilt.
>    - Re-enable binary (and app connections to the rebuilt DC)
>    - Turn on repairs
>    - Rest for a bit, then reverse the process for the remaining DCs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sean Durity – Staff Systems Engineer, Cassandra
>
>
>
> *From:* Maxim Parkachov <lazy.gop...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 30, 2020 10:05 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] How to reduce vnodes without downtime
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> with discussion about reducing default vnodes in version 4.0 I would like
> to ask, what would be optimal procedure to perform reduction of vnodes in
> existing 3.11.x cluster which was set up with default value 256. Cluster
> has 2 DC with 5 nodes each and RF=3. There is one more restriction, I could
> not add more servers, nor to create additional DC, everything is physical.
> This should be done without downtime.
>
>
>
> My idea for such procedure would be
>
>
>
> for each node:
>
> - decommission node
>
> - set auto_bootstrap to true and vnodes to 4
>
> - start and wait till node joins cluster
>
> - run cleanup on rest of nodes in cluster
>
> - run repair on whole cluster (not sure if needed after cleanup)
>
> - set auto_bootstrap to false
>
> repeat for each node
>
>
>
> rolling restart of cluster
>
> cluster repair
>
>
>
> Is this sounds right ? My concern is that after decommission, node will
> start on the same IP which could create some confusion.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Maxim.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> The information in this Internet Email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Email
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed
> to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this Email are subject
> to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing The Home
> Depot terms of business or client engagement letter. The Home Depot
> disclaims all responsibility and liability for the accuracy and content of
> this attachment and for any damages or losses arising from any
> inaccuracies, errors, viruses, e.g., worms, trojan horses, etc., or other
> items of a destructive nature, which may be contained in this attachment
> and shall not be liable for direct, indirect, consequential or special
> damages in connection with this e-mail message or its attachment.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information in this Internet Email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this Email
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed
> to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this Email are subject
> to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable governing The Home
> Depot terms of business or client engagement letter. The Home Depot
> disclaims all responsibility and liability for the accuracy and content of
> this attachment and for any damages or losses arising from any
> inaccuracies, errors, viruses, e.g., worms, trojan horses, etc., or other
> items of a destructive nature, which may be contained in this attachment
> and shall not be liable for direct, indirect, consequential or special
> damages in connection with this e-mail message or its attachment.
>

Reply via email to