Hello, I can see NullArgumentException has been removed from the lang3 API, but I don't understand why. There have been long discussions in the past why a NullArgumentException is better than using an IllegalArgumentException. Most people are using commons-lang anyway, so what's the point of removing NullArgumentException?
What if developers don't want to use IllegalArgumentException? Is is more advantageous to have these people provide their own NullArgumentException implementations? This is stupid. One of these reasons why the commons-* libs have been created was to fill the gap where the Java API has provided nothing. Now lang3 is there, too. If people aren't interested in using NullArgumentException as provided, why don't they simply ignore it or provide their own implementations? I don't understand it. Any comments/explanations to clear this up are welcome. Karsten ___________________________________________________________ SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
