On 11/29/13, 7:28 AM, Manuel Irribarra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the example page, I noted that Factory example for
> PooleableObjectFactory is wrong. When you extends
> BasePooledObjectFactory<?>, there only 2 methods required:
>
> + public <?> create()
> + public PooledObject<?> wrap (<?> object)
>
> I guess that create method must created a new object instance,
> but... ¿how I must use the wrap method?
>
> Any one have an example?
Yes, create() creates a new object instances.
wrap creates a PooledObject from a newly-created instance. There is
a DefaultPooledObject implementation provided. To use that, just use
@Override
public PooledObject<Foo> wrap(Foo foo) {
return new DefaultPooledObject<Foo>(foo);
}
Thanks for pointing out the problem with the example page. It needs to be
updated to reflect the new API. It is still using the old
PoolableObjectFactory, which no longer exists. I will replace this with a
working 2.0 example shortly.
Phil
>
> --
> *Manuel A. Irribarra Frex*
> *Ingeniero de Desarrollo*
> Altiuz Soluciones Tecnológicas de Negocios Ltda.
> Av. Nueva Tajamar 555 Of. 802, Las Condes - CP 7550099
> +56 2 2335 2461
> mirriba...@altiuz.cl <mailto:mirriba...@altiuz.cl>
> http://www.altiuz.cl
> http://www.altiuzreports.com <https://www.facebook.com/altiuz>
> <http://twitter.com/altiuz> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/altiuz>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
