Thanks, Ryan. But in the paper they said their Read operations retrieves an
entire record. And my nodes get even more memory than theirs. They has only
8GB ram while I got 24GB. The only difference is I use JBOD rather than
RAID10 array. I think JBOD would be better for HDFS than RAID. Is that
right?


2010/9/27 Ryan Rawson <[email protected]>

> hey,
>
> there are a lot of settings which all affect speed, you might want to
> make sure you are running the exact config the paper is. for example
> "readallfields".. if you have a wide column setting it to 'true' will
> go much slower (since you are returning a lot more data) than if you
> set it to false.  Also there are known bottlenecks in our HTable
> client, which exist to reduce the # of socket connections, but you can
> get higher performance with multiple VMs, although that is more
> complex.
>
> Also dont forget hardware.. .make sure your HW is the same as the papers.
>
> Good luck!
> -ryan
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Tao Xie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I want to reproduce the results in the ycsb paper. I  run hbase 0.20.6
> and
> > hadoop 0.20.2. My cluster is like this:
> >
> > 1 Node as HMaster + ZK
> >
> > 6 Nodes as DN, RS
> >
> > 1 Node as Hbase client.
> >
> > I think this environment is something like the one used by the paper.
> >
> > When I run tests like workloadb with 100 threads, I get at most 2500
> ops/sec
> > throughput and read latency is about 40~50 ms, which is much higher than
> the
> > paper results (about 10+ ms). I wonder if anybody is running ycsb too and
> > can give me some hints.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
>

Reply via email to