All right. Hopefully the new schema would solve that problem. On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:37 AM, David Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ted, > > Thank you for your response. I will take a look. > > With regards to the timeouts: I think changing the key design as outlined > above would ameliorate the situation since each map call only requests a > small amount of data as opposed to what could be a large chunk. I remember > that simply doing a get on one of the large outlier rows (~500mb) brought > down the region server involved. > > /David > > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If events for one user are processed by a single mapper, I think you > would > > >
