Yes, especially if the cross region communication is in process.

On Jan 12, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:

> bq. Coprocessors are meant to operate on the region to which they are
> associated.
> 
> For Anoop's case, the secondary table(s) have their regions aligned with
> the corresponding region from primary table. Meaning, related regions are
> served by the same region server.
> Would writes to such regions of secondary table(s) be acceptable ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> In pre-put, I trigger another Put() in an external table (to build the
>> secondary index).
>> 
>> We should probably call this a Coprocessor anti-pattern.
>> 
>> Coprocessors are meant to operate on the region to which they are
>> associated. They are a way you can extend HBase function while it operates
>> in region on data for the region. Think of them as loadable kernel modules.
>> They are not a general purpose server side platform for programming as if
>> you are building a HBase client (with HTable, etc.). Just because you can
>> do this doesn't mean you should.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Adrien Mogenet <[email protected]
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi there,
>>> 
>>> I'm experiencing some issues with CP. I'm trying to implement an indexing
>>> solution (inspired by Annop's slides). In pre-put, I trigger another
>> Put()
>>> in an external table (to build the secondary index). It works perfect for
>>> one client, but when I'm inserting data from 2 separate clients, I met
>>> issues with HTable object (the one used in pre-Put()), because it's not
>>> thread-safe. I decided to move on TablePool and that fixed my issue.
>>> 
>>> But if I increase the write-load (and concurrency) HBase is throwing a
>> OOM
>>> exception because it can't create new native threads. Looking at HBase
>>> metrics "threads count", I see that roughly 3500 threads are created.
>>> 
>>> I'm looking for documentation about how CPs are working with threads :
>>> what/when should I protect against concurrency issues ? How may I solve
>> my
>>> issue ?
>>> 
>>> Help is welcome :-)
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Adrien Mogenet
>>> 06.59.16.64.22
>>> http://www.mogenet.me
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> 
>>   - Andy
>> 
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
>> 

Reply via email to