Thanks Ignasi.  That worked.

Thanks,
Ranjith

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 4:03 PM Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote:

> I haven't tried it, but you should be able to define a Guice module that
> extends the default S3 module and overrides the request signer
> configuration. Then you can pass that one to the list of modules you pass
> when creating the context:
>
> @ConfiguresHttpApipublic static class S3V4SignerModule extends 
> S3HttpApiModule<S3Client> {
>    @Override
>    protected void bindRequestSigner() {
>       
> bind(RequestAuthorizeSignature.class).to(RequestAuthorizeSignatureV4.class).in(Scopes.SINGLETON);
>    }
> }
> public static void main(String[] args) {
>    ContextBuilder.newBuilder("s3")
>       ...
>       .modules(ImmutableSet.of(new S3V4SignerModule(), ...))
>       ...
> }
>
> ​
>
> Make sure you annotate the custom module with "@ConfiguresHttpApi".
> Can you try this?
>
>
>
> I.
>
>
> On 21 June 2018 at 11:58, Ranjith R <ranji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I was looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-480 and
>> it talks about the default signing for AWS being v4 and other s3 clones
>> being v2.  I just want to know if I can use v4 for a s3 clone?  Is there
>> any example that I can look at?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ranjith
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:21 PM Ranjith R <ranji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All - I know signature v4 signing is implemented for Amazon S3
>>> (aws-s3). Just wanted to know if I can use v4 signing for a non amazon
>>> cloud which supports S3 API and sigV4  (s3).  If it does, what changes
>>> should be done from the client side?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ranjith
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to