OK, it seems like you are comfortable with JUnit testing under ant but I think for purpose of the list, I will provide the following resource [1] for general info on configuring JUnit tests.
I would comment that you may be able to get a more verbose output if you set heltonerror, printsummary and formatter type="plain" for easier reading of output report. Basically what we are after is a report printed to a file or stdout to show where errors are present. Could you please have a look at the 'test' subsection of [1] and correct me on anything I have misinterpreted. [1] http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/junit.html Finally, although it seems like everything is OK, it would be great to crack this one. It would be useful to run just JUnit tests with Ant from the command line. On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Tim Pease <tim.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:51 AM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > > > What plugin are you hacking away on? You're own custom one or one already > > shipped with Nutch? Just so we are reading from the same page. > > > > Adding some "http.agent.name" support to the HTMLMetaProcessor found in > the parse-html plugin. For some reason all JUnit test results are not being > output to stdout when running the tests. The ant task claims there are > failures, but none are shown. > > I had to hack the ant task so that "haltonfailure" is true and "fork" is > false. Then the expected output was showing up. > > To shorten the test loop a little bit I was hoping ant provided an easy wan > to run just the tests for the parse-html plugin. > > Thanks for the speedy reply! > > Blessings, > TwP > > > This, along with some further documentation for running various classes > from > > the command line is definately worth inclusion in the CommandLineOptions > > page of the wiki. > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Tim Pease <tim.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> At the root of the Nutch 1.3 project, what is the magic ant incantation > to > >> run only the tests for the plugin I'm currently hacking away on? I'm > looking > >> for the command line syntax. > >> > >> Blessings, > >> TwP > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Lewis* > > -- *Lewis*
