Task slot is equivalent to core number. So one core can only run one task
at a time.

TD


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tathagata,
>
> Thank you. Is task slot equivalent to the core number? Or actually one
> core can run multiple tasks at the same time?
>
> Best,
>
> Fang, Yan
> yanfang...@gmail.com
> +1 (206) 849-4108
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Tathagata Das <
> tathagata.das1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The same executor can be used for both receiving and processing,
>> irrespective of the deployment mode (yarn, spark standalone, etc.) It boils
>> down to the number of cores / task slots that executor has. Each receiver
>> is like a long running task, so each of them occupy a slot. If there are
>> free slots in the executor then other tasks can be run on them.
>>
>> So if you are finding that the other tasks are being run, check how many
>> cores/task slots the executor has and whether there are more task slots
>> than the number of input dstream / receivers you are launching.
>>
>> @Praveen  your answers were pretty much spot on, thanks for chipping in!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Praveen,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the answer. That's interesting because if I only bring up
>>> one executor for the Spark Streaming, it seems only the receiver is
>>> working, no other tasks are happening, by checking the log and UI. Maybe
>>> it's just because the receiving task eats all the resource?, not because
>>> one executor can only run one receiver?
>>>
>>> Fang, Yan
>>> yanfang...@gmail.com
>>> +1 (206) 849-4108
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Praveen Seluka <psel...@qubole.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here are my answers. But am just getting started with Spark Streaming -
>>>> so please correct me if am wrong.
>>>> 1) Yes
>>>> 2) Receivers will run on executors. Its actually a job thats submitted
>>>> where # of tasks equals # of receivers. An executor can actually run more
>>>> than one task at the same time. Hence you could have more number of
>>>> receivers than executors but its not recommended I think.
>>>> 3) As said in 2, the executor where receiver task is running can be
>>>> used for map/reduce tasks. In yarn-cluster mode, the driver program is
>>>> actually run as application master (lives in the first container thats
>>>> launched) and this is not an executor - hence its not used for other
>>>> operations.
>>>> 4) the driver runs in a separate container. I think the same executor
>>>> can be used for receiver and the processing task also (this part am not
>>>> very sure)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am working to improve the parallelism of the Spark Streaming
>>>>> application. But I have problem in understanding how the executors are 
>>>>> used
>>>>> and the application is distributed.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. In YARN, is one executor equal one container?
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. I saw the statement that a streaming receiver runs on one work
>>>>> machine (*"n**ote that each input DStream creates a single receiver
>>>>> (running on a worker machine) that receives a single stream of data"*).
>>>>> Does the "work machine" mean the executor or physical machine? If I have
>>>>> more receivers than the executors, will it still work?
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. Is the executor that holds receiver also used for other operations,
>>>>> such as map, reduce, or fully occupied by the receiver? Similarly, if I 
>>>>> run
>>>>> in yarn-cluster mode, is the executor running driver program used by other
>>>>> operations too?
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. So if I have a driver program (cluster mode) and streaming
>>>>> receiver, do I have to have at least 2 executors because the program and
>>>>> streaming receiver have to be on different executors?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you. Sorry for having so many questions but I do want to
>>>>> understand how the Spark Streaming distributes in order to assign
>>>>> reasonable recourse.*_* Thank you again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Fang, Yan
>>>>> yanfang...@gmail.com
>>>>> +1 (206) 849-4108
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to