Awesome. yep - I have seen the warnings on UDTs, happy to keep up with the API changes :). Would this be a reasonable PR to toss up despite the API unstableness or would you prefer it to wait?
Thanks -Pat On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Michael Armbrust <mich...@databricks.com> wrote: > I'll caution that the UDTs are not a stable public interface yet. We'd > like to do this someday, but currently this feature is mostly for MLlib as > we have not finalized the API. > > Having an ordering could be useful, but I'll add that currently UDTs > actually exist in serialized from so the ordering would have to be on the > internal form, not the user visible form. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Patrick Woody <patrick.woo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> Currently looking into UDTs and I was wondering if it is reasonable to >> add the ability to define an Ordering (or if this is possible, then how)? >> Currently it will throw an error when non-Native types are used. >> >> Thanks! >> -Pat >> > >
