Would be great if you guys can test out the Spark 1.4.0 RC2 (RC3 coming out
soon) with Scala 2.11 and report issues.

TD

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:

> we are still running into issues with spark-shell not working on 2.11, but
> we are running on somewhat older master so maybe that has been resolved
> already.
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Dean Wampler <deanwamp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Most of the 2.11 issues are being resolved in Spark 1.4. For a while, the
>> Spark project has published maven artifacts that are compiled with 2.11 and
>> 2.10, although the downloads at http://spark.apache.org/downloads.html
>> are still all for 2.10.
>>
>> Dean Wampler, Ph.D.
>> Author: Programming Scala, 2nd Edition
>> <http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033073.do> (O'Reilly)
>> Typesafe <http://typesafe.com>
>> @deanwampler <http://twitter.com/deanwampler>
>> http://polyglotprogramming.com
>>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Ritesh Kumar Singh <
>> riteshoneinamill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, recommended version is 2.10 as all the features are not supported
>>> by 2.11 version. Kafka libraries and JDBC components are yet to be ported
>>> to 2.11 version. And so if your project doesn't depend on these components,
>>> you can give v2.11 a try.
>>>
>>> Here's a link
>>> <https://spark.apache.org/docs/1.2.0/building-spark.html#building-for-scala-211>
>>>  for
>>> building with 2.11 version.
>>>
>>> Though, you won't be running into any issues if you try v2.10 as of now.
>>> But then again, the future releases will have to shift to 2.11 version once
>>> support for v2.10 ends in the long run.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Punyashloka Biswal <
>>> punya.bis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Spark developers and users,
>>>>
>>>> Am I correct in believing that the recommended version of Scala to use
>>>> with Spark is currently 2.10? Is there any plan to switch to 2.11 in
>>>> future? Are there any advantages to using 2.11 today?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Punya
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to