Sorry, I should have specified that I'm specifically looking for that fat assembly behavior. Is it no longer possible?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com> wrote: > You're correct - Spark packaging has been shifted to not use the assembly > jar. > > To build now use "build/sbt package" > > > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 at 19:40, Efe Selcuk <efema...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Spark folks, >> >> With Spark 1.6 the 'assembly' target for sbt would build a fat jar with >> all of the main Spark dependencies for building an application. Against >> Spark 2, that target is no longer building a spark assembly, just ones for >> e.g. Flume and Kafka. >> >> I'm not well versed with maven and sbt, so I don't know how to go about >> figuring this out. >> >> Is this intended? Or am I missing something? >> >> Thanks. >> >