Hi Shay,

Thanks for your reply! I would very much like to use pyspark. However, my
project depends on GraphX, which is only available in the Scala API as far
as I know. So I'm locked with Scala and trying to find a way out. I wonder
if there's a way to go around it.

Best regards,
Yuhao Zhang


On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 5:36 AM Shay Elbaz <shay.el...@gm.com> wrote:

> Yuhao,
>
>
> You can use pyspark as entrypoint to your application. With py4j you can
> call Java/Scala functions from the python application. There's no need to
> use the pipe() function for that.
>
>
> Shay
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Yuhao Zhang <yhzhang1...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 9, 2022 4:13:42 AM
> *To:* user@spark.apache.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] RDD.pipe() for binary data
>
>
> *ATTENTION:* This email originated from outside of GM.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm currently working on a project involving transferring between  Spark
> 3.x (I use Scala) and a Python runtime. In Spark, data is stored in an RDD
> as floating-point number arrays/vectors and I have custom routines written
> in Python to process them. On the Spark side, I also have some operations
> specific to Spark Scala APIs, so I need to use both runtimes.
>
> Now to achieve data transfer I've been using the RDD.pipe() API, by 1.
> converting the arrays to strings in Spark and calling RDD.pipe(script.py)
> 2. Then Python receives the strings and casts them as Python's data
> structures and conducts operations. 3. Python converts the arrays into
> strings and prints them back to Spark. 4. Spark gets the strings and cast
> them back as arrays.
>
> Needless to say, this feels unnatural and slow to me, and there are some
> potential floating-point number precision issues, as I think the floating
> number arrays should have been transmitted as raw bytes. I found no way to
> use the RDD.pipe() for this purpose, as written in
> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/3331d4ccb7df9aeb1972ed86472269a9dbd261ff/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala#L139,
> .pipe() seems to be locked with text-based streaming.
>
> Can anyone shed some light on how I can achieve this? I'm trying to come
> up with a way that does not involve modifying the core Spark myself. One
> potential solution I can think of is saving/loading the RDD as binary files
> but I'm hoping to find a streaming-based solution. Any help is much
> appreciated, thanks!
>
>
> Best regards,
> Yuhao
>

Reply via email to