On Tue, November 22, 2005 1:24 pm, Craig McClanahan said: > For the long term, I absolutely agree with you ... and Shale will > certainly > serve as good "research and development" for what should be standardized > in > JSF 2.0.
Craig, that's an interesting comment, and I'd like to ask you to expand on it... specifically, are there plans to ensure forward-compatibility between Shale and JSF 2.0? The question I'm really getting at is if I start a Shale app today, ignoring whatever changes may come down in Shale itself since it's still a work-in-progress, will I be able to migrate my app to JSF 2.0, which it *sounds* like should wind up being comperable to Shale in terms of what it offers, or do I really need to make a choice between two divergent paths (even if the paths largely wind up intersecting)? In other words, is Shale future-proof with regard to JSF 2.0? :) > Craig Frank --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
