On 3/22/06, James Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As part of converting my app from vanilla faces to Shale, I decided to > convert my jsp files to jspx for two reasons. First, to prevent someone > else from employing scriplets in the future and, second, because I've > read that it's a good idea (maybe I've been reading all the wrong > stuff). > <snip/>
On the second - I've used jspx files when the markup emitted is XML based -- such as XHTML, VoiceXML or WML rendering. It takes better care of well-formedness concerns (plus the root element doesn't even have to be <jsp:root>, which is beautiful). On the first - Thats good, but what about <jsp:scriptlet> ? ;-) > Now I'm running into some newbie problems getting jspx pages to display > correctly so I'm starting to second guess myself. Is there any > advantage one way or the other as far as Shale is concerned? > <snap/> Probably not, but my experience with using jspx files has been similar (there are probably more "issues" with container processing of jspx files than jsp files -- regardless of container). Shale shouldn't care. -Rahul > Thanks > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
